UK

Nottingham killer’s sentence was not ‘unduly lenient’, judges rule

The sentence given to Nottingham killer Valdo Calocane was not “unduly lenient”, senior judges have ruled.

Calocane, 32, was handed an indefinite hospital order for the manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility of Grace O’Malley-Kumar, Barnaby Webber and Ian Coates, and the attempted murder of three others last June.

The attacker’s guilty pleas were accepted after medical evidence showed he has paranoid schizophrenia, with the judge at his sentencing saying he would be detained at a high-security hospital “very probably” for the rest of his life.

Grace Kumar, Barnaby Webber and Ian Coates
Image:
Grace Kumar, Barnaby Webber and Ian Coates. Pics: Family handouts

Attorney General Victoria Prentis referred the sentence to the Court of Appeal in February, arguing it was “unduly lenient”.

At a hearing last week, lawyers said Calocane should instead be given a “hybrid” life sentence, where he would first be treated for his paranoid schizophrenia before serving the remainder of his jail term in prison.

However this was rejected in a ruling from the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Edis and Mr Justice Garnham at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.

Calocane was sentenced at Nottingham Crown Court in January for the fatal stabbings of 19-year-old students Mr Webber and Ms O’Malley-Kumar and 65-year-old school caretaker Mr Coates in the early hours of 13 June last year.

After killing Mr Coates, Calocane stole his van and hit three pedestrians before being arrested.


Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

The victims’ families criticised Calocane’s sentence, with Mr Webber’s mother Emma saying in January that “true justice has not been served”.

Mr Coates’ son James said the killer had “got away with murder”.

The judges at the Court of Appeal could not examine or change the offences for which Calocane was sentenced and could not look at any new evidence related to the case.

Instead, they could only assess whether the sentence was unduly lenient based on the evidence before the sentencing judge at the time.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Articles You May Like

Nvidia says it will sell more of its next-generation Blackwell chips than previously anticipated
Trump picks Liberty Energy CEO and Oklo board member Chris Wright as Energy secretary
Another teenager dies after methanol poisonings in Laos – bringing total killed to six
A crushed car and trouser scraps: The Pulp fan club president who joined the band
Trump watches SpaceX launch, but test flight does not go as planned